Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Christopher Titmuss's avatar

Dear Tammy,

Thank you for your message. I followed the conventions in Substack Post on Jesus.

Jesus was born in Bethlehem, Palestine - as agreed by most UN nations.

If Jesus was born in say Afula, a town near Ein dor with its Buddhist centre, I would have written Jesus was an Israeli.

Neither Palestine nor Israel existed 2000 years ago. Both are products of the 20th century.

The Buddha was born in India even though the name 'India' was not used for this vast country until the end of colonialism in the 20th century.

Happy new year.

Love

Christopher

Sacred Psychology's avatar

Hello dear Christopher. I'm being super gentle here but wanting to point how the mind of most people works. The idiom 'Jesus was a Jew' used to be w thing. Now a days whether Jew in diaspora or not is really not a cool brew. Now, your post is it course true - if Jesus was from Bethlehem or Hebron or Nazareth he would of course be - post British occupation or whenever the precise delineation by patriarchs labelling pieces of land as owned territories - a Palestinian. But to the commonly educated person who when you say Jesus is was Palestinian you miss the option that it is immediately assumed Muslim. Not that you should really care, but I personally feel you are potentially adding fuel to a really inflamed fire which adds more soldiying to positions, opinions and ideologies. Happy to hear a clarification about your thoughts. Tammy

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?