Although this talk appears to have some great insights (thank you), the basic structure and constant errors make it inhuman and appear like AI. I would suggest this has been derived from an AI transcript and put online. It is unpleasant to read, very disjointed and does not flow. I suggest a human editor if you want to try this kind of thing.
Dear Cameron, Thanks for response. I neglected to put the article on tendencies thruogh the grammar checker. Hence the typos etc. I'm not even sure AI knows how to make spelling mistakes. Full responsibility rests with the author. I edited the text. Should read smoothly.
Although this talk appears to have some great insights (thank you), the basic structure and constant errors make it inhuman and appear like AI. I would suggest this has been derived from an AI transcript and put online. It is unpleasant to read, very disjointed and does not flow. I suggest a human editor if you want to try this kind of thing.
Dear Cameron, Thanks for response. I neglected to put the article on tendencies thruogh the grammar checker. Hence the typos etc. I'm not even sure AI knows how to make spelling mistakes. Full responsibility rests with the author. I edited the text. Should read smoothly.