Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Christopher Titmuss's avatar

Dear Hans, Thank you for your support for Andrew in working on the project of the book. Three primary reasons took place for my support for Andrew mentioned at the end of the review. 1. Reading the transparency in the book. 2. I know personally some of the US therapists/psychologists and others by reputation. He put himself in the best of hands. 3. In the six years, Andrew lived in Tiruvannamalai and offered satsang in recent years. I did not hear a word of him slipping back into his old problematic patterns, either in satsang or outside. As a servant of the Dharma, I don't believe in eternal damnation. Neither did the Buddha. love Christopher

Expand full comment
Hans Plasqui's avatar

Thank you, Christopher, for your beautiful and comprehensive book review. I wrote When Shadow Meets the Bodhisattva for Andrew in very close cooperation with him.

Even though Andrew wasn’t my guru, I have known him for 32 years. At first from a relative distance - as a public figure, with only occasional interactions, then, from the moment I began writing the book with him, from truly up close. After the project was finished, I stayed in relationship with him right until the very end of is life.

After all the shadow work you list in your review (and that we described in detail in the book), the whole writing process itself felt like a further transformation/integration of everything that had transpired. It was an incredibly profound and continuous inquiry into the idiosyncrasies, vulnerabilities, shadows and most delicate human frailties that made up his complex character and how all of that stood in conjunction with his powerful radical spirit, his relationships with his students and his teaching means. I was continuously impressed by his unusual degree of transparency, sincerity and vulnerability throughout - but perhaps above all, by the immense love he continued to feel for all his students.

It was obvious to all who knew him well that Andrew worked with his shadows with great seriousness, that he recognized his mistakes and sought to correct for them, quite literally with all of his life force over the course of more than a decade. He was a changed man because of it. He did not double down, as many of his “colleagues” have when confronted with their mistakes and shadows. This part of his legacy, I feel, needs to be honored as well. It may serve as an important inspiration for the further evolution of the guru-model.

So, I can only echo the spirit of the short phrases from the “friends of Andrew” that you cited at the beginning of your review. During the last decade of his life, Andrew had transformed into a very different human being – yet he retained an equally powerful capacity to transmit enlightened awareness and continued to be graced with a precision and clarity of insight that continued to help those who sought him out.

The fact that, after Andrew I, an actual Andrew II had emerged is still, I feel, something of a missing link in the reality of many former students.

I sometimes find myself wishing that more of those who have carried hurt and resentment might have found a way to reconnect with him during his final decade in this realm. Who knows — perhaps it could have supported their own journey in some meaningful way. But of course, this is just my personal reflection, shaped by what I see from where I stand. Each of us has our own unique process, and there are many different ways to integrate, heal, digest, and transform.

I hope his passing will, like a balloon that has been punctured, equalize all pressures, as the essence of the evolutionary love that he was at the deepest level merges seamlessly with the space around us.

May all who were touched by his presence be blessed!

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts